welcome research lab publications projects teaching professional eu activity
evaluator
|
auditor

Evaluator

EVALUATOR AND REVIEWER AT THE EUROPEAN LEVEL for the 4th, 5th, 6th and 7th Framework (1999-2013), H2020. (Evaluated and reviewed more than 160 multimillion euro proposals)

  • Invited by the European Commission as Evaluator/Recorder for the 7th Framework and H2020, November 2007, June 2007, November 2008, November 2009, January 2011, January 2013, March 2013, June 2015. Expert in Mobile and Wireless Computing, Distributed Systems, eBusiness, Energy and the Environemnt, Internet of Things, eHealth.
  • Invited by the European Commission as Evaluator for the 6th Framework, June 2003, November 2003, December 2003, May 2005, October 2005, November 2005, Expert in Mobile and Wireless Computing, eBusiness and Grid Computing.
  • Invited by the European Commission as Evaluator for the 5th Framework, Action Line II.4, IV2.1, IV2.4, July 1999, February 2000, June 2000, November 2000, February 2001, May 2001, June 2001. Expert in Mobile and Wireless Computing/Mobile Agents.
  • Invited by the European Commission as Auditor for the 4th and 5th Framework (GRID program), February 2002, June 2002, February 2003, March 2004, May 2005, Expert in Mobile and GRID Computing.
  • Invited by the European Commission as Auditor for the 5th and 7th Framework (KEY ACTION 2, eCommerce and eGoverment), February 2002, July 2002, January 2003, May 2007, January 2008, January 2009, June 2009 Expert in Mobile (Agents) and Electronic Commerce.
  • Invited by the European Commission as Auditor for the 4th Framework (ACTS program), Jan. 1999, Nov. 1999, January 2000, March 2000. Expert in Mobile and Wireless Computing/Mobile Agents.

Proposal Evaluation at the EU level entails evaluating a proposal based on a number of criteria listed below, while reviewing entails the evaluation of the progress and achievements of a proposal.

S/T QUALITY
“Scientific and/or technological excellence"
  • Soundness of concept, and quality of objectives
  • Progress beyond the state-of-the-art
  • Quality and effectiveness of the S/T methodology and associated work plan
IMPLEMENTATION
“Quality and efficiency of the implementation and the management"
  • Appropriateness of the management structure and procedures
  • Quality and relevant experience of the individual participants
  • Quality of the consortium as a whole (including complementarity, balance)
  • Appropriateness of the allocation and justification of the resources to be committed (budget, staff, equipment)
IMPACT
“Potential impact through the development, dissemination and use of project results”
  • Contribution, at the European and/or international level, to the expected impacts listed in the work programme under relevant topic/activity
  • Appropriateness of measures for the dissemination and/or exploitation of project results, and management of intellectual property.